Template talk:Did you know



Template talk:Did you know



Main
(T:DYK)
Rules (WP:DYK)
Suggestions (T:TDYK)
Discussion (WT:DYK)
Prep areas (T:DYK/P1 | P2)
Queue (T:DYK/Q)
Archive (WP:DYKA)
Stats (WP:DYKSTATS)

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. If you nominate an article, please consider reviewing another nomination. This will help cut down on the number of unreviewed nominations.

NOTE: This page loads very slowly with Internet Explorer. Regular contributors might like to try Firefox or Google Chrome instead.

Contents


Purge

Instructions

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial Guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK.

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. New Article, self nom: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=}}
  2. Expansion, self nom: {{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=expanded | author= | nominator= }}
  3. New Article by someone else: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author= | nominator=}}
  4. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom|article=|hook=... that ?|status=|author=|nominator=|image=|rollover=|alttext=}}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author and nominator username fields; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not list a "nominator" if it is a self nom; leave that field blank.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.
Do wikilink words in the hook, especially the article title.

An example of how to use the template is given below. Don't forget to fill out the rollover text, so people know what the image is of! Full details are at {{NewDYKnom}}:

{{subst:NewDYKnom
 | article    = Example
 | status     = new<!--(or)  expanded-->
 | hook       = ... that this [[article]] is an  '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | author     = User
 | nominator  =
 | image      = Example.png
 | rollover   = An example image
 | alttext    = Description of the image
 | comment    =
}}

How to review a nomination

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, or may suggest new hooks.

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or note that there is an issue with the article or hook, please use the following symbols to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
Symbol confirmed.svg {{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
Pictogram voting keep.svg {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
Symbol question.svg {{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
Symbol possible vote.svg {{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
Symbol delete vote.svg {{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page, in case they do not notice that there is an issue.

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly update the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.


Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on March 18

Sexual Healing (South Park)

A man wearing a black suit jacket and gray tie smiles as he speaks into a microphone.


Dome F105

Gandan Sumtseling Monastery.jpg

Gandan Sumtseling Monastery

  • Symbol confirmed.svg - I checked the bit about the fifth dalai lama so

... that the Fifth Dalai Lama established the Gandan Sumtseling Monastery (pictured) in Zhongdian, Yunnan in China in 1679? Victuallers (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Minet el-Beida

A gate that pierces the city walls and probably led down to the water-front - although the site is now quite a way from the sea.

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg - Thanks, is it possible to find more about the place that isn't archaeology? e.g. a photo of a modernish bit, or some scenery? Victuallers (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for verifying. I added a photo of the walls of Ugarit. I am afraid the site itself (Minet el-Beida) has little distinguishable ruins anymore, and certainly nothing modern as its a protect area. I will expand a little more on the history of the site and significance of the findings there, and try to find a scenic photo of the bay. Yazan (talk) 16:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Utility room

  • This is problematic. This is a paid-access citation but I would expect it to be an article about utility rooms becoming more popular than laundry rooms, not about language change as the Wikipedia article seems to claim. Utility rooms (by that name) were a common feature of houses where I grew up in Middle America. Rmhermen (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC) .... and if I wanted etymology I think I'd go to wiktionary as the article advertises. Its an unusual subject for an encyclopedia Victuallers (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

SS Empire Cedric

Treaty (song)

John Toner

  • Article moved from userspace on March 18. -Grondemar 04:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Jacob Kamm

  • 5x expansion (354B to 2723B) tedder (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
...(alt) that steamboat and railway investor, Jacob Kamm, died five years after being hit by a cyclist? - Say who he is and don't include every detail? Victuallers (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 17

Walsh-Kaiser Company

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Couldn't confirm hook from source. Gatoclass (talk) 04:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Oh well, I'll change it then.
  • ALT1:...that after the original owner of the Walsh-Kaiser Company shipyard showed incompetence, a shipbuilding and a construction company were brought in to finish the job?

Pitcher (container)

Eleanor Roosevelt's water pitcher

Johnnie Bassett

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Couldn't confirm that "Got a Job" was The Miracles' first single. Gatoclass (talk) 11:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I've added a new reference that confirms it. SilverserenC 16:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Chonan

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Offline refs AGF. Nice article, would make a fine lead if we had a pic. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Ethics AdviceLine for Journalists

Typhoon Nida (2009)

Las Damas Romanas

Juan Luna's Las Damas Romanas.

.(alt).. that since its rediscovery in 2008, the estimated value of Juan Luna's painting Las Damas Romanas (The Roman Maidens) (pictured) has varied from 10,000 Euros to $1.2 million?

Annunciation to the shepherds

Annunciation to the Shepherds by Gaddi Taddeo


Ulnaby

Tetarteron and Histamenon

Obverse and revers of gold coin, showing busts of Christ and crowned emperor


Washington Bottom Farm

Villa de Zaachila

  • Seems good. 5x expansion. Age OK Pictogram voting keep.svg anyone speak Spanish to check hook? Victuallers (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Rubén Jaramillo

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg offline sources on good faith everything good to go.Thelmadatter (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Basilikon

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Verified; the bit about the Catalan Company must be in Hendy 1985, which I have no access to, so I was unable to verify the referencing entirely. Todor→Bozhinov 19:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Sera Chí¶ding Hermitage

Sera Chí¶de.jpg

Green Mada'in Association for Agricultural Development

Valentine Kiss and Sayuri KokushÅ

  • You can just add the second article; no problem. Ucucha 22:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Norrie May-Welby

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Too short, article needs a minimum of 1500 characters of text, currently only has 837. Gatoclass (talk) 06:20, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I have expanded it. Please recheck. SilverserenC 17:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Tom Cruise Purple

Cattle and Cane

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Verified original hook, can't feature the alt per our BLP rules. Gatoclass (talk) 06:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Yanko Sakazov

Orvieto Papacy

A sixteenth century well

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Source says he took refuge in 1528 and doesn't mention the Sack of Rome. Gatoclass (talk) 06:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


Hoka Hey Motorcycle Challenge

  • Symbol possible vote.svg There are no inline citations (including the hook).

Alfrredo Navarro Salanga

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Aside from any other potential issues - I've not reviewed it - this is an incredibly boring hook. Please suggest an ALT. cmadler (talk) 13:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT 1: ... that Alfrredo Navarro Salanga, author of the Filipino novella The Birthing of Hannibal Valdez, was a three-time Palanca Memorial Awardee? - AnakngAraw (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT 2: ... that Alfrredo Navarro Salanga, a three-time Palanca Awardee and author of The Birthing of Hannibal Valdez, was also known as "Daddy Giant"? - AnakngAraw (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Maurice Sanford Fox

Pairwise summation

Articles created/expanded on March 16

Harry Crosby

ALT1 ... that Harry Crosby who had an open marriage with his wife Caresse Crosby, and published early works of struggling writers like James Joyce and Ezra Pound, committed suicide in a pact with his lover?

5x expanded by Btphelps (talk). Self nom at 15:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Siege of Leith

  • Comment: alts welcome

Created by Victuallers (talk), Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk). Self nom at 23:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thx - happy with alt Victuallers (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Billie Jean black sequin jacket

I think that this would be a better hook because it shows not only Michael's love for his black sequin jacket, but also his fansDinhoGauch10 (talk) 04:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Manawan, Quebec

Muckaty station

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Looks okay. Certified quirky. Gatoclass (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Erschallet, ihr Lieder, erklinget, ihr Saiten, BWV 172

Symbol question.svg I have two concerns with this nomination: 1) The article needs to be copyedited (I'm short on time this week or I'd do it myself). 2) Hook fact doesn't seem particularly interesting. Is there something that might be more interesting about this cantata? Maybe that he originally wrote it in C major, moved it to D major with the first revision, and then moved it back to C major? Or something else? If these are addressed, I recommend adding it to the 3/21 holding area for Bach's 325th birthday. cmadler (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
The hook fact may not seem interesting to you but ask the Bach fellows who claim that he would ALWAYS close with a chorale, - compare this from Cantata (highlighted by me): "The essential point, however, in Bach's church cantatas is that they formed part of a church service. Many of Bach's greatest cantatas begin with an elaborate chorus followed by a couple of arias and recitatives, and end with a plain chorale. This has often been commented upon as an example of Bach's indifference to artistic climax in the work as a whole. But no one will maintain this who realizes the place which the church cantata occupied in the Lutheran church service. The text was carefully based upon the gospel or lessons for the day; unless the cantata was short the sermon probably took place after the first chorus or one of the arias, and the congregation joined in the final chorale." So I think the hook is quite a statement. - But I will keep thinking. - The C - D - major thing is simple: tuning was different in Leipzig, so he switched, but then it got too high for the choir, and he switched back. That would be for specialists only. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I didn't really think the key was that big a deal, of course the meaning and significance of key and tonality has changed over time and depending on tuning (equal tempered, just tempered, etc.). But without a certain degree of familiarity with Bach's cantatas it's not apparent that closing with a repeat of the opening chorus is remarkable; it's common in many forms of music (and perhaps even in cantatas by other composers?) to conclude with a repetition of the opening, or at least a restatement. Maybe this hook can be reworded, as we did with BWV 191 ("around 200 cantatas in German but only one...in Latin?") to make it clear the degree to which this is unusual? cmadler (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't know immediately a polite way to be more explicit, found that rude enough a way of fighting the so-called "plain chorale". (I don't know a single chorale of Bach - and I know some - that I would describe as "plain".) - I thought about: that Bach loved the piece so much that he still reworked it more than 15 years later, whereas the common thing to do was to compose a new one each year if possible. Would need to be phrased ... ideas welcome for both. (btw I'll be off tomorrow.) o.k. trying one more variation on the theme - and certainly we did the repeat in 2000 and heard interesting comments, nobody believed that it had been Bach himself who wanted it that way, at least in 1714, - no repeat in 1731.:

Timbuwarra

Georges de Regibus

A well-built white man with a moustache and short hair wearing a light shirt and a wreath on his head.

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg All good. Foreign language refs AGF (although I understood most of it). Nice addition to WP. -- P 1 9 9 - TALK 16:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks! I did my best to find English sources, but it seems nobody had posted anything about him online until now. Todor→Bozhinov 16:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


UdiWWW

Created by Smallman12q (talk). Nominated by Smallman12q (talk) at 20:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Dorofei

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Hilarious! AGF on Russian sources. Found confirmation at Pravda Online, which, however, I don't think is a reliable source, so I didn't add to the article. cmadler (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT1

... that after losing a fight with Mikhail Gorbachev's cat, Dmitry Medvedev's cat Dorofei was castrated? --Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 06:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg English source supports both hooks. Prefer ALT1. cmadler (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Lionello Cecil

Note: someone else created it, but it was basically a word for word copy of another web page. I have rewritten it somewhat. Aiken ♫ 14:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Added "microphone" to hook, because that's what both the source and the article say. cmadler (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Walter Cornock

Thirty pieces of silver

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article creation & length check out. AGF on offline citation for hook fact. cmadler (talk) 14:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

AN/PSQ-20

A soldier walking in a forest, wearing grey-green camouflage and helmet, holding a gun with both hands. A yellow colored night vision device is attached to his helmet.

  • Symbol confirmed.svg-Length, date, hook, and source are fine. $10,000 for night-vision is a bit steep...even for the military=P.Smallman12q (talk) 21:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Martyrs' Lane

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Currently only a x3 expansion, needs to be x5 to qualify. Gatoclass (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Bracken, Texas

A new reference has been added, and the claim is also made in the Batcon.org page at the bottom of the paragraph. --William S. Saturn (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I wouldn't be comfortable referencing a claim as strong as this with sources like these. While they may be Wikipedia-reliable, I would prefer an actual peer-reviewed or otherwise academic source if I were to write the article. Ucucha 01:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
doi:10.1093/icb/icn051 says it's one of the largest colonies in their study area, and ISBN 9780801434754 that it is the largest bat colony in the world. Ucucha 01:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I added another reference, which also supports the claim. It is probably one of the most reliable sites on the web: Handbook of Texas Online. --William S. Saturn (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I changed the wording of the hook to "colony", which aligns it with the Handbook's wording and is less vague. Ucucha 12:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Art Pavilion in Zagreb

  • Comment: Expanded from 602 characters to around 3,300

5x expanded by Timbouctou (talk). Self nom at 06:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg 5x expansion is a fact, hook, length and date verified as well. Todor→Bozhinov 13:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Carlos Alonso

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Length, date and hook refs verified. --Bruce1eetalk 06:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Otumba de Gómez Farí­as

Tyler Seguin

Joseph H. Allen

Engraving portrait of a man with wavy hair, bushy eyebrows, and a large beard; man is wearing a suit and facing to his left.

Eoplectreurys

  • Symbol confirmed.svgLength, date, and reference are good. I thought that "series" was an obscure botanical term for a taxonomic rank below genus, but I see that it is also an obscure term within some invertebrate classifications for a taxonomic rank above family. I realize that most people probably won't be confused by this, as they will be unfamiliar with either definition, but I still think that the hook will make more sense to a general audience if we remove "series". Millifolium (talk) 00:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Gowardia

Israeli naval campaign in Operation Yoav

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Looks good. Changed the hook a bit to match the article; I hope you don't mind. NW (Talk) 03:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Noah Marullo

Javier Arias Stella

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Way too short. The DYK length requirement is 1,500 characters of prose. Todor→Bozhinov 17:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I have expanded it so that it is at 1700 characters now. Is it good to go? SilverserenC 01:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Overall length look ok now, but the article looks sort of incomplete to me because of the very short sections. Is it possible to expand or combine some of them? But there are more important issues to be fixed: The source given for the foreign minister fact is a blog, and the part about involvement in the Paquisha War is uncited. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 02:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • They can be expanded, yes, and i'm working on that. The reference for the foreign minister fact was replaced with two others, and a reference was added for the Paquisha War fact. SilverserenC 02:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Good enough. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 12:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 15

Sean Reilly (Louisiana politician)

Never Before (album)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Length and date verified, offline hooks refs accepted in good faith. I think the first hook is more interesting. --Bruce1eetalk 10:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Agreed. My personal preference would be the first hook as well. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
  • That being the case, I've struck-out ALT 1. --Bruce1eetalk 14:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Fang Island

MUZU TV

  • Symbol question.svg While this does check out in all regards, "is seen as" strikes me as a bit weasel-wordy. Care to suggest a different hook for this article, or a rewording of this one? cmadler (talk) 12:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thomas Hengelbrock

Battles of Wenden (1577-1578)

Adolf Karl Ludwig Claus

Even hexagon in which the   diametric corners are connected.


Coucoucache, Quebec

James Cumming

  • Symbol question.svg-I can't find the source for this. Your reference to The 1702 chair of chemistry at Cambridge: transformation and change states page 318, yet the book has 318 pages. Are you sure it is on the last page?Smallman12q (talk) 21:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC) The "318" is the number of pages (pp means pages) - I missed adding p.146 (which I have now added) sorry and thx for review Victuallers (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • The pp paramater isn't meant for that, its meant to indicate multiple pages fro example 5-7, whereas the p paramater is for a single page. I'm not sure if you are aware, but there is a citation tool at http://reftag.appspot.com/ that will make it much much easier to cite google books=P.
  • Now as for the source, I looked at page 146, and was a bit perplexed as to the lexical ambiguity of their sentence, despite the fact that this was a Cambridge University Press publication . It states "...and frequently executed a cat with an electric shock." How does one interpret this? Was a cat frequently executed via electrocution in that it had multiple lives...or was it that the professor electrocuted a single cat at a time? Your current phrasing "where he was known to electrocute a cat?" implies that there was a single cat which was electrocuted multiple times by the professor. The text, however, appears to implie that by executing a cat, that he killed one cat each time. This really isn't your fault, but rather the author who introduced lexical ambiguity by using poor grammar.
  • There's also the question of "entertaining". The source states that "Cumming literally shocked audiences with an electric shock". Although from a sardonic viewpoint, this could be considered entertaining, I'm not quite sure if "shocking" people would be considered entertainment here on wikipedia...(this is of course debatable).
  • It was a most interesting read...to see that a dept. chair would condone and partake in such behavior is indeed of interest=P.
  • I hope you do not find me to be an adversary, but here at Wikipedia we do try and strive for accuracy when possible. I cannot rate this DYK nomination because I have edited the article and would not like to create a COI(conflict of interest), however, another editor is free to evaluate this DYK nomination.Smallman12q (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, I have only read this thread and haven't seen the article at all, but I oppose the hook, merely because it would naturally induce negative reaction in most readers, not to mention cat lovers. In other words, I don't see a need for selecting negative facts of questionable notability for the main page. Materialscientist (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
No problem with the "frequently executed a cat" - as any fule kno you cannot execute an individual cat more than once. Don't see any issue with shocking his audiences either. Sounds quite jolly. DuncanHill (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
(edit conflict)I have started a thread at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Lexical_Ambiguity.Smallman12q (talk) 01:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Green Lantern (film)

Alkali Lake Chemical Waste Dump

  • Moved to mainspace on March 15. tedder (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

America is in the Heart

Frankish Papacy

Walter Lappert

  • Nice hook, but the source doesn't actually state he sold the whole first batch on Kauai. Gatoclass (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Tambouras

illustration of a man in pantaloons, playing a stringed woooden instrument with a long, thin neck

... that the Tambouras, a Greek traditional string instrument of the lute family and ancestor of the bouzouki, features moveable frets? - I.M.S. (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

As it will appear exotic and interesting to many readers, I would simply state something about the instrument itself. - I.M.S. (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg I like ALT1, or I see potential for an April Fools Day Tamboura/Tambouras hook. However, the article must have inline citations for DYK; it currently has none. cmadler (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment I agree with ALT 1; I will endeavour to improve the referencing; as it was created by a (changing) IP, I may not be able to contact them to improve references - from discussions with them, I believe that they are going to create an account, so I will try. I will also try and source at least some of it, in-line, myself.  Chzz  â–º  23:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed? I have added inline citations to support at least all the facts given in ALT1.  Chzz  â–º  00:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Yes, I was going to point out the inline citation problem as well. The article looks great now (hook fact is sourced). - I.M.S. (talk) 02:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

David Holman

1882-83 West Bromwich Albion F.C. season

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Confirmed length, article creation, hook length. AGF for offline source. Good hook! cmadler (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Allan Walters

Head-and-shoulders portrait of a caucasian man in dark tie, white shirt, and dark jacket with pilot's wings on left-breast pocket


Toxotes chatareus

Side view of a silvery-gold fish with four brown stripes occupying most of the centre foreground, with a dark background. The fish is arrowhead-shaped, with a pointed snout and large eye

  • Comment: Image probably needs to be cropped to remove the watermark, but I'm not sure how to do that. Intelligentsium 00:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svgDate, length, and refs are good. I'd change the hook to say what this animal is, in case it doesn't get a picture:
  • I also think that as cool as their fecundity is, spitting water at their prey is way cooler. How about a hook like:
Millifolium (talk) 06:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Watermarked images are copyrighted. Cropping the watermark is not a solution.--Wetman (talk) 14:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
The copyright holder has licensed the image under a license appropriate for Wikipedia. The terms of that license include permission for the creation of derivative works, such as a version with the watermark cropped away. Ucucha 14:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I removed the watermark. Millifolium (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661

Lango Sinkamba

Causes of the May Revolution

Joseph Bonaparte

Mohini

alt = A wooden nude woman, wearing garlands and holding a flower and parrot, leaning on a stick. Two bearded nude maen with erect penises pointing to her, with folded hands held above their heads.

  • I prefer the wooden sculpture. But if nudity is an issue, I suggest the other one. Though the latter image is not used in the article, an image showing the whole sculpture is used, but that one does not look good in 100X100 px. --Redtigerxyz Talk 14:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTCENSORED. Pick whatever image more effectively illustrates the article. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Commented 1 image. --Redtigerxyz Talk 19:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svgDate, length, and refs all good. Easy contender for lead hook. The image is fine. Ceoil sláinte 20:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


Sixteenth government of Israel

Carlbury

William Hutcheon Hall

Sebacina

A white crust covers the base and low branches of a plant.


Viterbo Papacy

Palazzo dei Papi di Viterbo


Hungargunn Bear It'n Mind

Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone

Articles created/expanded on March 14

The Possum

Richard Stapley

Cécile DeWitt-Morette

Weekend Wogan

Kevin Reilly (Louisiana politician)

Oryzomys nelsoni

Euryoryzomys emmonsae

John Erskine Clarke

Leith Hall

Christopher Bruun

The Rosales Saga, Tree (novel), The Pretenders (novel), Mass (novel)

Author of the Rosales Saga

  • Comment: Quadrupled hook nominations

Created by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 19:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

  • If this image is used, its alt text needs to be improved to meet the guidelines at WP:ALT. rʨanaÉ¢ (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


The Power of Madonna

A middle-aged woman with wavy blonde hair smiles, gazing to her right


Hello (Glee)

Karl Ludwig Giesecke

Taklung Monastery and Riwoche Monastery

Thistle, Utah

An arial picture of of a de-stabilized mountain sliding and creating a dam and lake. Various construction activity is present to the left of the slide area.

Note: One of the key sources for this hook is currently down. Google's cached version [1] can confirm the hook in the interim.Dave (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Site is back up.Dave (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

German submarine U-78 (1940)

Araneagryllus

Articles created/expanded on March 13

Throne of God

John Ricord

Kamehameha III

  • Comment: moved to main space March 13 after developing in user space for a few days

Created by W Nowicki (talk). Nominated by W Nowicki (talk) at 00:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Treaty of Seringapatam, Third Anglo-Mysore War

Neville Bertie-Clay

Drs. Foster & Smith

  • Comment: article was developed outside of mainspace over a period of time & moved into mainspace today

Created by ThaddeusB (talk), DFSBrent (talk). Nominated by ThaddeusB (talk) at 04:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I am considering trying to bring this article up to GA status in the future. As such, if the reviewer is willing to assess the article and/or provide constructive criticism I would much appreciate it. Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Into Temptation (film)

Erioderma pedicellatum

Leafy blue-green lichen growing on tree

Bridge of Flowers (bridge)

Bridge of Flowers

  • Symbol possible vote.svg This is really interesting, and meets the length and article creation requirements. Unfortunately, this article is sourced entirely to the Bridge of Flowers website, which is not a reliable secondary source. Please improve the article sourcing and then this can be used. cmadler (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed. I found one sight but it triggered the spam filter, but another one was solid. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • ALT1 ... that, because it could not be repaired due to the cost, nor removed due to a major water main, a trolley bridge was turned into a garden called the Bridge of Flowers (pictured)? cmadler (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


Bamba Sutherland

Colorado State Highway 35

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Date checks out. The problem is that the DYK checker comes up 696 characters of prose (lists and tables don't count), far short of the 2000 characters minimum. You have several days to expand the new article. Royalbroil 22:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Correction: the DYK requirement is 1500 characters of prose, not 2000. But 696 is too short either way. cmadler (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Boekenweek

  • Comment: The subject is also of interest because the event is currently being held till March 20, 2010.

Created by Simeon (talk). Self nom at 20:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Viajero

F. Sionil José

  • This image is also used in a nomination higher up; it should only be used once. rʨanaÉ¢ (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


2001 Angola train attack

Antonio Alice

Flader J55

Twice Blessed

Chenowth Advanced Light Strike Vehicle

Agrimonia gryposepala

  • Symbol question.svg Why "but"? Many species in Rosaceae are woodland trees (eg those in Sorbus; Prunus etc). Ericoides (talk) 17:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Ron Gomez

State of War (novel)

  • Symbol question.svg Checks out, but where does a source say the author is "award winning"? -SusanLesch (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg Need third opinion here - I am not happy with most references, some statements (State of War was also called as "one of the finest novels of 1988" - by whom? is enotes.com respectable?) and maybe even notability of this novel (most Google hits are from book publishers, who would obviously promote a book they print). Materialscientist (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on March 12

Siobhan Magnus

Gustav Storm

Noncoding DNA

Devil's Brood

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Date and length OK. The only online citation for the imprisonment that I can see is a blog - unless I've missed something. The main ref for the imprisonment is offline. So I'm accepting the offline citation AGF.--Storye book (talk) 11:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

1901 Michigan Wolverines football team

1901 Michigan Wolverines football team

  • Symbol question.svg Length, date and image all check out. But it's difficult to verify all the points in the hook as it's a complex article, and those online links which I accessed did not bear out the hook, apart from the 550-0. One of the online citation links is broken. So please could you copy the hook into the header, with all the appropriate citations alongside? If you let me know on my talk page when you done it (quote name of article), I can then update the review. Thanks.--Storye book (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


Confederate war finance


Add alt-text!
Add rollover text!

  • ALT1:... that one of the ways that the Confederacy financed their military effort during the American Civil War was by issuing money which paid interest?
  • Comment: Maybe "92 times over" should be replaced by "by 9200%". Alt image for first hook could be the Confederate money (after "printing money" in the hook). An image for the alt hook could be the Confederate dollar stamped to indicate that interest had been paid. Other hooks can be generated from the article.

Created by Radeksz (talk). Nominated by Radeksz (talk) at 12:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Five-dollar bill issued by the Confederate States of America
  • Here's an image of a Confederate banknote -- as an alternative to the graph. (This particular file is not in the article, but the image is in the in the article as part of a composite file that includes two banknotes.) --Orlady (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment: I say add the image with the two notes. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 07:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm fine with any of that. The two note image is nice (though I always like graphs - but that's just me).radek (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Exidia glandulosa

A clump of gelatinous, brain-like, shiny black lobes growing on a rotting piece of wood

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Date, length, and refs are good. Great picture! Millifolium (talk) 06:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Piercebridge, Piercebridge Roman Fort

Piercebridge village green

5x expanded by Storye book (talk). Nominated by Storye book (talk) at 10:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Update: In response to someone kindly installing the DYK length-check gadget for me a few hours ago, I have now checked and corrected the length of Piercebridge Roman Fort, so that both the above noms are now at sufficient 5x expanded length.--Storye book (talk) 11:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Ridgeway Hill Viking burial pit

  • "...although Oxford Archaeology project manager David Score noted, that without analysis of all of the bodies, it was impossible to know for certain that all the decapitated men were Vikings.

Villiers High School

  • Hey, all you nice and smart folks at DYK, help me out here. I'm inclined to remove the entire "and some of them..." phrase--it's not very elegant, and the hook becomes nice and short. But what I'm concerned with is that the resulting hook may sound--callous? judgmental? when in reality the school seems to be doing pretty good. Your suggestions are appreciated. All you hookwriters and -editors: Materialscientist? Dravecky? Ucucha? Or the God of DYK, Alansohn? Drmies (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I see what you mean. Here a possible less "callous" sounding hook:
Let me know what you think. Jujutacular T · C 22:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
To me, that sounds like English is the first language of the windows but not of the doors. Ucucha 00:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Changing it into "... 92% of students at West-London's ..." would solve that problem, though. Ucucha 00:04, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
That sounds good to me. Thanks to both. Speaking of sounds, both of you are overdoing it on the U sounds in your user name--lighten up a bit, will ya. Drmies (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I'll make a request at CHU immediately :) Jujutacular T · C 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg for ref fact when you agree. I'd suggest "one in ten children speak English as their first language at ..." Victuallers (talk) 13:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Piercebridge

Piercebridge

  • This article has also been nominated as a double DYK (see nomination above, in same 12 March section)


Citadel of Damascus

Citadel of Damascus

  • added image, but if hook is too long now, just leave it out. Zoeperkoe (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Works for me. Yazan (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg I prefer ALT1. It's not entirely unusual for castles to be built on level ground. -- P 1 9 9 - TALK 12:41, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • In Syria its location is unusual, actually, and that's also what the reference to the hook says. How about:
ALT2 ... that the location of the Citadel of Damascus (pictured) on flat ground is unusual because castles in Syria were usually built on the top of a hill? Zoeperkoe (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Piercebridge Roman Fort

Piercebridge Roman Fort

  • This article has also been nominated as a double DYK (see nomination above, in same 12 March section)


Paro Taktsang

Taktshang2.jpg

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Date, length and hook check out.--Storye book (talk) 09:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Leslie Barrett

The theatre was the American Mime Theatre if anyone wants to try for a double hook. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 05:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Date and length OK. Both elements of the hook are supported by an offline citation. Accepted AGF.--Storye book (talk) 09:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 11

Palace of Omurtag

Excavated ruins at the Palace of Omurtag


GCV Infantry Fighting Vehicle

GCV Infantry Fighting Vehicle

This source says it will be the first tactical vehicle with a less lethal weapon. Other strategic vehicles in the US Military, such as recovery vehicles, refueling vehicles, and transporters might have less lethal weapons but I've never heard of it before. I can manually check the weapon suites of other U.S. Military vehicles if you want me to. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


Room & Board

  • Symbol confirmed.svg All ok, though hook is difficult to parse. Ceoil sláinte 16:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
  • And sorry it isn't very international. -SusanLesch (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Sorry for being rude (just asking questions which will likely fall onto our heads later), but I don't understand the main hook, the alt hook, why this company is notable, and why this nom isn't a promotion of that company. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Materialscientist. Good question. I suppose it is promotion of a company. I rescued this article from deletion, and think if Wikipedia has an article about Pottery Barn (and other commercial entities) then we should have this one too. The hook was just a cool fact that I happened to find in The New York Times. I don't mind switching hooks or pulling this nomination if you'd like me to. -SusanLesch (talk) 00:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT2: that for Room & Board, designer Vladimir Kagan built a facsimile of his sofa that Christie's had sold for $190,000?

List of historical opera characters

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Several problems: List of historical opera characters does not appear anywhere in the hook; the hook is too long; the article has no inline citations; the article has under 900 characters of prose (even though DYKcheck says 29195). --Bruce1eetalk 12:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Chee Kung Tong Society Building

Chee Kung Tong Society Hall Gate Back.JPG

  • What does "once mentioned" mean in this context? Does "delineated" mean "signified"?--Wetman (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Nothing personal, but did you even look at the picture or click the link? That aside, upon reading it again, it does sound abit clunky. Hmmmm.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 18:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


Almond Blossom Cross Country

Almond blossom aug 2007.jpg

  • Symbol question.svg Date and length check out, but citation link for hook is a blacklisted link. Could you find an alternative valid online link for the citation - or an alternative hook with verifiable citation?--Storye book (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)


    • I spent a good half an hour trying to find a better cite but I found nothing. The site is blacklisted for spam reasons, but the linked article has obvious value for the article. The problem is a strange one: the reason is so obvious that no other sources seemed bothered to state the obvious! What can I do? Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 17:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I'd recommend an alternative hook, which will allow you to find a proper citation.--Storye book (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Or maybe not as that's blacklisted too! Let us pursue with the less elegant hook of:

Knut Kleve

  • Thanks for evaluating the hook, and suggesting a revised alternative. I like your suggestion, and either hook is fine with me. Oceanh (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Ave Imperator, morituri te salutant

5x expanded by FT2 (talk). Self nom at 00:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Lacklustre doesn't work for me. Two options:
ALT8 "...was so upset at their refusal to kill that he ran around a lake pleading with the men to fight?"
ALT9 "...had to run around a lake pleading and threatening before the men would fight?"
(Just noticed the original page was wrongly titled as well as incorrect, hence page moved from "Ave Caesar..." to the original source text's "Ave Imperator...") FT2 (Talk | email) 02:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
New problem: I like both new suggestions equally and cannot decide which to prefer ;-). Very good! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
"Had to run" might carry a certain hook that "ran" doesn't, and "was so upset [...] refusal to kill" does too. FT2 (Talk | email) 14:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Can some third party please do the verification? Everything looks good to me now... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Nice and hooky and all that, but the running around is only according to Suetonius. The other writers don't mention it. Verified as far as it goes though (there's probably some tick graphic for that, feel free to add it on my behalf). Yomanganitalk 16:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Yomangani's quite right; making the Caesars look ridiculous was a hobby and delight for Suetonius; we're a few miles from the realm of facts here but I can see no problem with this if the hook acknowledges its source. Haploidavey (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 10

Hungry Bentley

  • Comment: alts welcome
  • note - moved back from April Fools

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Jimmy Sexton

  • Corrected tense: lead -> led. Here and in the article. Jujutacular T · C 22:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Ah yes, my mistake. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 03:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

R v Burgess

  • Article lacks inline citations.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Canigou Cambrai

  • Many of the sources in the article seem somewhat questionable as far as their reliability is concerned. The fact in the hook, for example, is from pubquizhelp.com.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Swapped out the reference with an alternative, however it's in Icelandic. For some reason Crufts don't seem to host a simple list of winners on their website. Miyagawa (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Frank T. Johns

  • The hook doesn't mention what country it is talking about. I'm also a little concerned that the article is mostly based on the guy's own party's convention minutes.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

San Bartolo Coyotepec

  • It might be a good idea to write a "married Roman Catholic priest" since this wouldn't be unusual for other religions.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Mexico ought to be linked too, and consider linking "married Roman Catholic priest" to clerical marriage. Todor→Bozhinov 14:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • It is questionable if he is a Roman Catholic priest since the Church no longer recognizes him as such.Thelmadatter (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Underwater Archaeology Branch, Naval History & Heritage Command

  • The article is almost completely based on a Navy website and not on secondary sources.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • The page has been updated with 7 separate outside sources including four published sources. Leachers1987 (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Need one citation per paragraph. A number of paragraphs are lacking one.Thelmadatter (talk) 15:31, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment: Leachers1987 has been adding them. OK now? - ukexpat (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

John Evan Thomas (1810 - 1873)

  • ALT 2 (shorter version of original hook): ... that Welsh sculptor John Evan Thomas was so often confused with English sculptor John Thomas that the Englishman's statue Boadicea was moved to Wales before it was realised it was not the Welshman's work? -- EdJogg (talk) 01:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I've just realised it's not a 5x expansion, so please accept the nomination as creation by User:Victorianaesthete on 9 March - that one is still valid.--Storye book (talk) 09:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Binding selectivity

The hook needs to contain a wikilink to the article. Stonemason89 (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Done Calmer Waters 17:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
"is of major importance" is kind of vague. Also, there are unreferenced paragraphs in the article.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Both of these observations arise out of the fact that this article presents an over-view of a very broad topic. Each section has a general reference. References are not given for topics covered in detail in the {{main}} links. Petergans (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 9

Aiphanes minima

Colleen LaRose

Nancy Nathanson

Bad (Michael Jackson song)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Not quite a 5x expansion yet. The article had 3337 characters of readable prose on 25 February and now has 10927 characters, a 3.27x expansion. You'll need to expand to at least 16685 characters before it's eligible. -- BigDom 22:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I've just added an expansion on the article, does my recent editions to the article consist of a 5x expansion now? Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 02:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
  • It's now 14770 characters, and you still need to expand to 16685.--Storye book (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

What A Guy!

  • I don't really see what's unusual about this fact. Couldn't something more interesting be found.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948)

Robert Kennedy

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Currently up for AfD. I've expressed my opinion there. Gatoclass (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
You sure did. You called Robert Kennedy writings "rant", and have chosen to ignore at least three reliable sources for the hooks only. --Mbz1 (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Currently uncertain whether this one will survive the AfD or not, but numerous editors have expressed concerns about the article's lack of neutrality including myself, and I don't see the problems being resolved quickly. Therefore I am opposing promotion of this one, regardless of whether it survives the AfD or not. Gatoclass (talk) 05:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
It is incorrect to say the least. Tiamut, who added POV tag, has agreed to remove it, and it was removed from the article. The only reason of you comment is I just do not like it. It is the time to stop the insinuations, isn't it? If you'd like to continue constructive discussion about so called "the article's lack of neutrality" I invite you to share your concerns at the article's discussion page, where it belongs. --Mbz1 (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
It's not an "insinuation" to express the view that an article is POV, it is part of one's responsibility as a wikipedian to do so where appropriate. I don't know what Tiamut's view is, but that's her affair, I am of the view that the article is still POV and I have a right to express that view as much as anyone else.
Should the article survive the AfD, I may indeed propose some changes on the talk page or even make some changes myself. Until that time however, I am not inclined to waste my time trying to fix an article that may soon be deleted. But in any case I am under no obligation to try and NPOV articles proposed for DYK, that is the responsibility of the article creator and if you fail to do so, that really isn't my problem. Gatoclass (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
And BTW, it is not the case that Tiamut agrees the article is now NPOV, she only said she would stop adding the tag since you keep removing it. But she clearly still has concerns about the article, as expressed in her last post at the talk page, here. Certainly, I would tag the article myself except that would make me responsible for trying to fix it, and that's not a responsibility I am inclined to take on right now. Gatoclass (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Half of the truth is not the truth, you know. She said: "...and you've made an effort to improve it, so I won't replace it for now. I may return to the issue with more specific concerns in the future though." (highlighted by me), but so far she did not. Once again it is not the right place to discuss the neutrality of the article. I understand you do not want "to waste your time trying to fix an article that may soon be deleted. " Then may I please ask you to stop wasting your and mine time here?--Mbz1 (talk) 23:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Half of the truth is not the truth
Quite, but perhaps you should have taken your own advice before implying that Tiamut now approves of the article. As for time wasting, seems to me you are the one who has wasted a great deal of everyone's time by writing an article that was immediately nominated for AfD on the basis of numerous apparent inadequacies, and which others have had to spend a considerable amount of time trying to rectify, so I hardly think you are in a position to accuse others of this particular vice. And finally in regard to your other comment, while this is not a venue for discussing particular problems in an article, it is certainly appropriate to note that an article may have problems which exclude it from promotion, without which we would not have a DYK process at all. Gatoclass (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Tra-ta-tra-ta-tra-tttt. Would you please stop lying as right now? I said "Tiamut, who added POV tag, has agreed to remove it, and it was removed from the article". Where did I say "Tiamut now approves of the article?" The article was nominated for deletion by a very biased user, who lied in the deletion request, and I could prove it. Now, I consider your statements about the article to be a discrimination against my English and my writing skills. Stop it!--Mbz1 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
So having already accused me of bad faith with the WP:IDONTLIKEIT comment, you are now accusing both myself and others of lying because they disagree with you? Sorry, but you are not doing your case any favours at all with such attacks. But for the record, I repudiate the charge that I "lied" about anything. Quite frankly, I think that if anyone has misrepresented the facts in this discussion, you have. You claimed Tiamut "agreed to remove the tag", when all she really did was acquiesce in your repeated removal of it, while expressing continued concerns about the article. You implied I was the only one with NPOV concerns about the article, when a look at the AfD page shows that numerous editors have expressed similar concerns.
Obviously, you are irritated that I have opposed promotion of this article. But misstating the facts in order to mount baseless personal attacks is not going to help your cause. Gatoclass (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I will never ever ever accuse anybody in lying because we disagree. If I stated something like that, it means I could confirm it with many evidences. Please take your concerns about my "personal attacks" to any board of your choice, and I will easily prove that I had rather good reasons to say what I said, and now please stop it.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Um, sorry, but calling someone a liar is transparently a personal attack and there can be no dispute about that. And claiming you have "many evidences" that I am a liar is just digging the hole deeper. I'm not going to report you to a noticeboard about these attacks because I can't be bothered with the wikidrama, nor would I want to burden the community with such nonsense, but what I can do is remind you that if you persist in trying to personalize disputes, it will only be a matter of time before you find yourself sanctioned for such behaviour. Gatoclass (talk) 06:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I did not accused you in a bad faith. You did, when you first called the article "a rant", and then accused me that I made Kennedy "sound like a cheerleader for Zionism". Guess what, Kennedy was a strong supporter of Israel. Please see that pro-Arab book page 651. It clearly states that for Kennedy Jews were good, and Arabs were bad. I assure I had no influence on Robert Kennedy at all. It is his words, that you just do not like.--Mbz1 (talk) 06:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, and I withdrew that remark as soon as you complained, as I realized it was potentially offensive. But it seems you are still hanging onto it. Just one more thing you are apparently not prepared to WP:AGF about. Gatoclass (talk) 09:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
No it is not appropriate to note "that an article may have problems which exclude it from promotion, without which we would not have a DYK process at all." not without providing any example from the article anyway , and not without adding to that statemnet of yours "In my opinion".--Mbz1 (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I already stated what I felt was wrong with the article at the AfD. But for your benefit, I will repeat those concerns here. Firstly, the article consists almost entirely of quotes from Kennedy's articles, which in this case are a primary rather than secondary source. Secondly, it entirely excludes the commentary about these articles from the available secondary sources. Thirdly, the commentary about Kennedy's assassination is WP:COATRACK. Finally, secondary sourcing for this article is extremely thin, to the point that its viability as a standalone article is questionable (a position held by numerous contributors at the AfD). So hopefully now it is clear to you and anyone else what my objections to this article are. Gatoclass (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
The quote from the article: "Sirhan happened to see a documentary about Kennedy in Palestine in 1948. Later in his murder trial Sirhan Sirhan testified: "...I hoped he will win Presidency until that moment. But when I saw, heard, he was supporting Israel, sir, not in 1968, but he was supporting, it from all the way from its inception in 1948, sir..."" page 658 page 103. Otherwise, if the article survives Afd, may I please ask a closing admin to check out the "thin" sources and external links in the article itself. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment whatever the result of the deletion request, the DYK hook is very biased and out of context. You can change it , as a bare minimum to have some sort of neutrality to "The Jews with their backs to the sea, fighting for their very homes, will accept no compromise....On the other hand, the Arabs shall crush forever the invader [... and] carry on the fight". The Jews are seen by the Arabs as invaders, that's why they say that...--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I'll think about other hook, if the article will not get deleted. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


Bikini Barista

  • Comment: "Mixing up" as in "confusing" and therefore a comment on their intellectual abilities or just "mixing"?! "Making" is probably better. - ukexpat (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Haha. There are anecdotes in the news coverage about the coffee not being the best at some places, but yes, I agree that "making" would be better.--Milowent (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Unless you hold this for April Fool's Day (where I think it would fit nicely), in which case the first phrasing is more fun.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Moved article from "Bikini Barista" to "Bikini barista", and changed capitalization in the hook proposal. I like the idea of using this on 4/1. cmadler (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
4-1 is fine by me! And thanks for fixing the capitalization.--Milowent (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

British Hero of the Holocaust

Sir Nicholas Winton, October 2007

... that at 100 years old, Sir Nicholas Winton was named a British Hero of the Holocaust, an award otherwise given as a posthumous recognition of British Holocaust rescuers? Created by MickMacNee (talk). Self nom at 22:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg The hook is not quite accurate in claiming "otherwise given"; what about "Denis Avey aged 91" as cited in the lede? Ericoides (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
(alt)

... that at 100 years old, Sir Nicholas Winton was named a British Hero of the Holocaust?

Symbol confirmed.svg for cut down hook Victuallers (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I can't think of anything better given Ericoides' observation, but the original idea of the hook was to point out the fact it was mostly posthumous contrasting it with his age, so if anyone has a short way of making it more accurate...., otherwise, I guess its the shorter one suggested by Victuallers.... MickMacNee (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • "Mainly" or "more usually" rather than "otherwise" may be appropriate. Actually I think most readers would appreciate the correlation between posthumous and the age of your subject matter, without any 'nudge' in the precise wording. My 90 year old mother-in-law spent her early married life in the Channel Islands under German occupation - so this subject matter strikes a real chord with me. Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I originally suggested "usually" but then crossed it out when I realised this was a one-off award, which makes "usually" or "mainly" somewhat meaningless. What about:
  • ALT2 ...... that at 100 years old, Sir Nicholas Winton is one of only two living British Heroes of the Holocaust? Ericoides (talk) 08:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I've drawn a total blank here. I honestly cannot think of anything exciting for a hook that highlights what I originally intended. I suggest two options - if the hook is selected with the image, then we go with:
  • and if the image is not included, then:

Lars Aspeflaten

What Is a Man Without a Moustache?

SongMeanings

Captain Bill McDonald

ALT:... that Captain Bill McDonald of the Texas Rangers, as a youth during the Reconstruction era in Texas, was tried and acquitted of treason?
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Both verified. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 13:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Solar Turbines

Point Lonsdale Lighthouse

May Day Eve

I am not sure about this, but I have also bolded the "married" part linked to Marriage and wedding customs in the Philippines. I am reverting/cancelling my withdrawal of the nom for Marriage and wedding customs in the Philippines on March 4, 2010. But I originally nominated/suggested it on 28, 2010 (See history here) If not, you may debold it, as you wish. But I hope this will be reconsidered. Thank you. - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
The purpose is to create a double-nom in good faith. - AnakngAraw (talk) 01:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Since the problems, which kept the marriage article from being accepted in the frist place still persist, I do think it should be de-bolded.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 8

Bamba Mí¼ller

Bamba Muller, Cinderella

  • Help and alts welcome Victuallers (talk) 08:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • nb This has been moved back from April Fools Victuallers (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nom at 18:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Sven Moren, Noregs Ungdomslag

Falkuša

List of National Historic Landmarks in Missouri

Laryngeal cleft

  • I've moved this to the right date of creation, as I had duplicated it not seeing it nominated above.--BelovedFreak 17:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Pyridoxamine

Pretty Baby....

  • According to the cited source, it was "the first time in British soap history" that this was done. No claim is made regarding soaps in other countries. I've updated the article and the hook with this clarification. cmadler (talk) 13:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I've changed the source to one saying "This was a first for a soap". anemoneprojectors talk 14:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Barro negro pottery

Symbol question.svg Almost. Was at 1470 before expansion and current at 6221 characters of prose. Need 7350 to meet 5x. Calmer Waters 03:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I should have it now. Thelmadatter (talk) 19:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
7282. I have decapped Barro Negro; correct me if I'm wrong. Materialscientist (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Dang, I cant find more informtion.... up to you guys if you want to let it slide. Yes it should be decapped.Thelmadatter (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Grace, Replaced

Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories

ALT: ... that although US President Barack Obama is a Christian, al-Qaida chief commander Ayman al-Zawahiri has advanced a theory that Obama secretly "pray[s] the prayers of the Jews"? Stonemason89 (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps we can even leave out the part that says he is a Christian from the hook. And please confirm that there are no BLP concerns with this hook. Ucucha 16:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

1968 in the Vietnam War

Dead VietCong Shock Trooper

*ALT1 ... the week of February 11-17, during 1968 in the Vietnam War saw the most 543 Americans killed in action, and 2547 were wounded.
  • ALT2 ... that during the week of February 11-17, 1968 in the Vietnam War American forces suffered the most casualties with 543 KIA and 2547 wounded?
  • Seems odd to have a dead VC illustrating a hook about dead Americans. Ericoides (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
The hook is about the Americans but the article is about the Vietnam War i.e. there were Vietnamese people in the Vietnam war too not just Americans. -- Esemono (talk) 01:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • If you don't mind that, then it's OK. I was just pointing out a disjunction between text and image that bothered me. Of greater concern is that neither hook is grammatically sound. Could you please rewrite them? Ericoides (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Ouch! Embarrassing grammar on my behalf. How about now? -- Esemono (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Hmmm. Still seems a bit convoluted to me. What about something really simple like:
  • ALT3... that 1968 in the Vietnam War saw the most deaths (pictured) of the entire war? Ericoides (talk) 16:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah makes sense that 1968 would have the most deaths total of the war but all I have a citation for is 1968 saw the most American deaths in the Vietnam war. -- Esemono (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • In your lede you say "The year also became the deadliest of the Vietnam war with the 27,915 ARVN soldiers killed and the Americans suffering 16,592 killed." You give cites for these. Should that bit be deleted then? I'm confused. Ericoides (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I mean I don't know for sure about the North Vietnamese, and Vietcong causalities. Yes for America and its allies it was the deadliest year. -- Esemono (talk) 23:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, that was my stupidity. What about (assuming it's OK to have a category as a link (I'm not sure it is)):
ALT4 ... that 1968 in the Vietnam War was the deadliest year in the war for America and its Vietnamese allies? Ericoides (talk) 08:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Sounds fine but I like my original and ALT2 hook better -- Esemono (talk) 13:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, they are ungrammatical and don't make much sense; I'll let someone else take over. Ericoides (talk) 13:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
I think the problem is that 1968 in the Vietnam War does not really work as part of a full sentence. Can we pipe the link?
ALT5 ... that 1968 was the deadliest year in the Vietnam war for the United States and its Vietnamese allies? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT6 ... that 1968, with 16,592 killed, was the deadliest year in the Vietnam war for the United States? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 7

Anna Fitziu

  • Symbol question.svg - Article is substantially unsourced. DYK hook cited to unavailable New York Times article. -Juliancolton | Talk 01:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Article cleaned up and sourced. -- Esemono (talk) 01:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Oskélanéo, Quebec

World Junior Squash Championships

1922 Vallenar earthquake

  • Symbol question.svgThe only line that mentions deaths (and only from the tsunami) is not cited.Thelmadatter (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I've added a cite as requested, I've not been able to find any sources that quote numbers for deaths from the earthquake rather than the tsunami - the USGS summary page is all there is. Mikenorton (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Aryabhata's sine table

  • Changed "first ever" to "first". cmadler (talk) 13:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Moorefield and North Branch Turnpike

  • Is there a more unusual or interesting fact in the article? A road being built to facilitate travel doesn't strike me as very surprising.--Carabinieri (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Christopher O. Ward

August 8-9, 1993, tornado outbreak

  • Thats a much better hook, im fine with it. -Marcusmax(speak) 22:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Filipino cartoon and animation

  • Symbol question.svg Very dubious hook: the only reliable-sourced statement I see in refs is "about 90 percent of American television cartoons are now produced in Asia" (CNN; maybe I missed some other?); I don't see where the second part comes from (Bill Dennis quote?). Materialscientist (talk) 06:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I inserted a ref for the first suggested hook above: see page 7 to 8 of http://www.tholons.com/nl_pdf/150508_philippine_Animation_Industry.pdf - AnakngAraw (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
How about this hook, ALT 1: ... that most televised American cartoon animations are now developed in Asian countries such as the the Philippines? - AnakngAraw (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT 2: ... that most televised cartoon animations in the U.S. are now Philippine-made because of the Filipinos' familiarity with Western humor? - AnakngAraw (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't observe reliable support for the strong statement that most cartoons are produced in Philipines. The pdf above is hardly a reliable source. The ALT1 phrasing is too obscure, even if we replace "such as" with more appropriate "including". Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, I now turn to you and perhaps better from others for suggestions. Other editors other than you may have a more positive look on this issue. - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
I would be happy if you first reflected in the article the split up (even approximate) in cartoon production between the Asian countries, with reliable references (well, we don't need other Asian countries, but both CNN refs you provided so far talk about Asian countries, not Philipines in particular). This would allow developing a justified hook. Materialscientist (talk) 00:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT 3: ... that the first Filipino-made cartoon series for television, Panday, was created by Gerry Garcia in the 1980s? - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
ALT 4: ... that the first Filipino full-length animated film, Adarna, was created by Gerry Garcia in the late 1990s? - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Added something from the CNN ref, thus suggesting also ALT 5: that approximately 90% of televised cartoon animations in the U.S. are now made in Asia? - AnakngAraw (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
and ALT 6: ... that American animation companies are setting up more cartoon studios in the Philippines? - AnakngAraw (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems as you're trying to squeeze out refs that you had whereas I thought the breakthrough should come with new references. ALT5 is not relevant (calling Philipines Asia), ALT6 is too vague. ALT 3: refs says "first animation series" - doesn't sound same as "first cartoon" (individual one). Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

added "series" for ALT 3. Forgot/overlooked that one. - AnakngAraw (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Clara Gregory Baer

  • Symbol possible vote.svg The prose has only been expanded 3.28x (3103/946). The quotes are not included in the count. Can you expand it some more? --Bruce1eetalk 09:11, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I thought the quotes would count. I'll see if I can add something this evening.--SPhilbrickT 12:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Jhalkaribai

  • I would like to see this article on Wikipedia Main Page on International Women's Day if possible. Shivashree (talk) 09:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Thank you for expansion (verified). We'll see what can we do on such short notice. Meanwhile, I have the following concerns: the article abruptly ends her life description on ".. and declared herself to be the queen Laxmibai" leaving us suspended in the most interesting moment, wondering what happened to her then? Also, when and how did she die? Some phrasing needs brushing up, though this is a more technical issue. Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I have added some information in the Life section. Shivashree (talk) 11:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
You've added a single sentence "Jhalkaribai lived long thereafter and died as a very old woman" which doesn't sound encyclopedic and doesn't solve the problem indicated above. Materialscientist (talk) 08:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
To say "the English army" (repeating the error in the article) would be misleading, as there was no English army at the time and even the British Army was not the main combatant on the "English" side. The later reference in the Jhalkaribai article to "the company army" (that is, an army of the East India Company) is sharper, but see Presidency armies. Moonraker2 (talk) 12:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

(alt) ... that Jhalkaribai fought with the East India Company army in disguise as Queen Laxmibai of Jhansi during the Indian Rebellion of 1857 to let the queen escape easily out of the fort? Shivashree (talk) 11:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

I have added a paragraph to the life section about her marriage and introduction to Queen Laxmibai. However, despite a long search, I could find no sources about her later life. Whatever I could find revolves around her fight with the tiger, her resemblance with the queen, and the incident of her disguise. It is obvious given that Jhalkaribai's story had never been a part of mainstream historiography. After her only contemporary reference by Vishnubhat Godse, we could find her first reference in Varma'a Jhansi ki Rani written almost after 100 years in 1951. Most of what is written about her in the last two decades has been written viewing her importance sociopolitical aspect rather than keeping an objective historical view. Even the history textbooks describe her story as "trivia" and complete it in one or two sentences (See this). I will try to find sources directly from someone who is acquainted to the subject. The life section of the article can be considered complete till we could find some reliable sources. Shivashree (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Offline refs AGF for the alt hook (online ref confirms the fact, though). We can include only what reliable sources say, after all. I believe this is good enough to go, unless Materialscientist or anyone else has any objections? ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 13:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 6

Draft Ron Paul movement

Thomas Wiswall

List of Rhodesian and Zimbabwean football champions

  • Symbol question.svg Verified article creation and length. This statement needs to be supported by an inline citation. There is currently a debate over whether the citation can appear in a list/table/chart or whether it must appear in prose; however, in this article no citation is given that I can find. cmadler (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Citation is given in the general references at the bottom of the page. I'll add some clarification on the matter. - Cliftonianthe orangey bit 16:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Holly Graf

  • 1st Alt: ... that US Navy Captain Holly Graf commanded USS Winston S. Churchill and later USS Cowpens before being relieved of her command on January 13, 2010? Moonraker2 (talk) 15:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg This has several issues: 1) bare URLs need to be replaced with formatted citations. I personally recommend {{cite}} or {{cite web}} as they are quite easy. 2) I'm concerned about this article from a WP:BLP perspective. Given that she's recieved numerous awards, and had 25 years of military service before being relieved of command (23 years of service before even becoming a commanding officer), I'm concerned that this article (and both proposed hooks) focus excessively on the recent negative events. (DYK rule 4 states, "Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.") Because of this issue, the article will need quite a bit of work to become DYK-eligible. cmadler (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Muriel Dickson

A Puro Dolor

Notes: The article was re-directed by PeaceNT to the Son By Four article. "A Puro Dolor" was created by Magiciandude under the title "Purest of Pain", which I re-directed to it's current title "A Puro Dolor" .Jaespinoza (talk) 10:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 5

Ladd & Co.

19th-century general in uniform

  • ALT1:=... that Ladd & Co. was behind the first commercial sugar plantation in Hawaii and failed international land deal?
  • Comment: moved from user space March 5; picture optional of course since article is not about him but the company and its American founders

Created by W Nowicki (talk). Nominated by W Nowicki (talk) at 19:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


A Portrait of the Artist as Filipino

  • Symbol question.svg Verified article length, expansion, and hook fact, however, this article is classified as a stub. Also, although the hook fact comes from the New York Times, I am uncertain about the reliability of other sources used, and I'd like a second reviewer to take a look at that aspect. cmadler (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • It was stub-class before the 5x expansion that I did. It just needs to be reclassified. - AnakngAraw (talk) 22:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Biggest Elvis: A Novel

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Unsure about about notability here. Most of the references seem to be snippets (for instance, the NPR one is a single sentence, and the NYT one that's cited 6 times is little more than a plot summary, and the one from the Kenyon College alumni bulletin is little more than a passing mention) or Amazon/B&N listings. This caught my eye because I've taken a class with Kluge before, and I always approach articles relating to people I know with an extra degree of skepticism... rʨanaÉ¢ talk/contribs 05:13, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Added these. See Pretenders to the King's Throne, and What happened on August 04, 1996 Los Angeles Times. - AnakngAraw (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The Man (Who Thought) He Looked Like Robert Taylor

  • I think it's pretty clear from the article that this is what the novel is about but can you put a sentence that corresponds directly to the hook in the article (presumably in the lede) and source it? radek (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
The hook is based on reference number 2 (at the very end of that ref site); I quoted that already as seen in article ref section. - AnakngAraw (talk) 08:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed placement of ref mark too to show which belongs to what sentence. - AnakngAraw (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
The reference appears to be a newsgroup FAQ. I'm not sure that qualifies as a reliable source. Is there anything in the Ty source that good be used to source it?radek (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
This source might work [2] though I'm not 100% sure it's RS either.radek (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Or even better this [3], which is clearly a reliable source. Can you incorporate it into the article?radek (talk) 09:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Refs suggested works out. Thanks. Incorporated done also as requested. - AnakngAraw (talk) 09:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg, good to go.radek (talk) 10:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Symbol possible vote.svg The article is based on references which IMO clearly fail WP:RS criteria. Materialscientist (talk) 11:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I think the Ty source in the article is reliable but a lot of the inline citations are to stuff that may not be. I would suggest replacing as much of the lesson plan and usenet sources with Ty (which is actually available online here [4]) and the source I gave above. The introduction to Santos' own works, since its written by a someone else can also be used [5]. Or this one [6].radek (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Dinopanorpidae, Dinokanaga, and Dinokanaga

Tweak again into triple nomination for the family and both genera in the family.--Kevmin (talk) 19:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
  • These meet the eligibility requirements, but Dinokanaga needs some copy editing first. I left one comment on the Dinopanorpa talk page that should be addressed. Millifolium (talk) 08:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Commented on the Dinopanorpa talkpage, Dinokanaga page wordsmithed.--Kevmin (talk) 23:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Pinki Pramanik

  • "A group of youths" doubtless intended.--Wetman (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Isn't there something more positive, maybe regarding her achievements? I don't really think we should be talking about how she was harassed on the main page. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 10:27, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 4

Coenurosis

  • Comment: I'm still cleaning up the references in this apparent first article by a rookie wikipedian. I might continue on Thursday or Friday. Please feel free to beat me to this. :-) --PFHLai (talk) 22:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Created by Kbechelli (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 22:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Article needs some cleaning up. For example, the "Morphology" section says "The following are pictures of coenurosis cysts, some which have been surgically removed from humans and others that have been removed from animals after death", but the article contains no pictures (this makes me wonder if the article was copied from another source?). Also, the body of the article needs to be wikified. cmadler (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

  • Comment: Chromatin immunoprecipitation became a redirect to Immunoprecipitation in 2008. Shengliu started the article Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, apparently a first article by a rookie wikipedian, on March 4th. I merged the two histories together a few days ago, and am still in the process of cleaning up the merged article. I might continue on Thursday or Friday. Please feel free to beat me to this. :-) --PFHLai (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Created by Shengliu (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 23:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  • I'll see if I can make a double-DYK hook with ChIA-PET, which moved out of User:Arolland's userspace on March 4, 2010. I'll try not to make it too technical. --PFHLai (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Lion class battlecruiser

  • Hook's at 215. Not sure how to shorten it, except use something generic like "ships" to cover the targets, removing most of interesting aspects of the hook. Everything else checks out though.radek (talk) 04:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Best I can come up with now is "that the British battlecruiser HMS Lion fired seven torpedoes at the German battleships, the battlecruiser Derfflinger and the light cruiser Wiesbaden, during the Battle of Jutland without success".radek (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Mayor of Manukau

  • Comment: Moved into mainspace on 4 March.

Created by Schwede66 (talk). Self nom at 11:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on March 3

Rudy La Scala

ALT1: that singer-songwriter Rudy La Scala had the best-performing Latin single of 1990 in the United States?
  • This article is based primarily on the subject's own website.--Carabinieri (talk) 04:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
That is the reason I did the ALT version of the hook. The ALT is based in the Billboard Year-end charts of 1990.Jaespinoza (talk) 06:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm not concerned about the reliability of the hook, but about the article not satisfying DYK standards, because it's not based on third-party sources.--Carabinieri (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
This article has been really hard to do. I didn't find any source about the singer-songwriter (Billboard, Allmusic, Google Books). The main reason to do the article is that he had two number-one songs in the Top Latin Songs chart, and I want to take that list to FL status. Any sugestions?. Jaespinoza (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

William Milman

  • Symbol question.svg Though this is an eye-catching hook it seems misleading from the article and the reference. --Mcorazao (talk) 23:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
    I don't see evidence for Milman wanted to wear that. Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
If he went into a shop to order an MB waistcoat, then presumably he wanted to wear it. Seems he was an interesting person for all sorts of reasons which is why I put him forward. I'm not concerned about what happens to any nominations once I've submitted them, so over to you. The last eye-catching hook I did got 8600 hits - the generally boring straightforward ones have averaged about 600. Motmit (talk) 12:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Sure, but I would go for an eye catching fact, "presumably he wanted to wear it" is guessing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

History of vice in Texas

  • ALT1: ... that when officials cracked down on vice in Texas during the 1940s and 1950s, some of Texas' most notorious crime figures helped establish major casinos in Las Vegas, including the Sands Hotel? --Mcorazao (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg I've been trying to verify the hook, but without success. From online sources cited in the article, I can verify that two Texans who were involved in gambling ended up in Las Vegas (Jake/Jakie Freedman was an owner of the Sands, although in one place is described as its front man[7][8] and casino owner Benny Binion was a "Texas outlaw" who was proud of his police record and served time in Texas prison after establishing a Las Vegas casino[9] [10]). (Some other sources aren't available online.) However, I can't find an indication -- in either the article or the sources -- that these were "some of Texas' most notorious crime figures" or that they moved to Las Vegas after a crackdown on vice in Texas. I like the hook, but I'm wondering if we need alternate wording or a different hook altogether. --Orlady (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I added a couple more citations to help. Here are some quotes that talk a little about the crackdowns.
  • "There was a crackdown on Texas gambling after the war. There had been twenty-seven casinos in the Dallas area during the war." -Thompson (2001), p. 21.[11]
  • "... Wilson won the position of attorney general in 1956. Wilson looked upon gambling in Galveston as the symbol of vice in Texas ... Wilson ... swooped onto the island in June 1957 and closed forty-seven clubs ..." - McComb (2008), p. 33.
  • "the state watched a 1951 grand jury investigation [in fort Worth] ... The jury indicted more than 16 gamblers ... Eventually ... gamblers found it easier to go to Las Vegas where gambling was legal ..." - McComb (2008), p. 33-34.
Some stuff about Binion:
  • Gatewood, Jim (2002). Benny Binion: The legend of Benny Binion, Dallas gambler and mob boss.
  • "Benny ... opened a casino game at the Southland Hotel, and ... established a leadership role in the Dallas numbers game.
    ... some felt they could stay [in Dallas] and try to it ride out [the crackdowns] ... Binion did not. He packed up his family in 1946 and went to Las Vegas." - Thompson (2001), p. 21.[12]
On the Maceos
  • "Galveston, under the influence of Sam and Rosario (Rose) Maceo, exploited the prohibition of liquor and gambling by offering illegal drinks and betting in nightclubs and saloons. -Handbook of Texas: Galveston, TX[13]
  • "Rosario "Rose" and Sam Maceo surfaced as the underworld leaders in Galveston." - McComb (2008), p. 33.
  • "...total income from Maceo operations was $3,329,000 in 1948, $3,433,000 in 1949, and $3,835,000 in 1950." - McComb (1986), p. 185.[14]
On Freedman
  • "By the 1930s, Jakie Freedman's was the place for the young to go in the spirit of adventure. ... This was a very handsome, very expensive, and very illegal gambling casino." - Johnston (1991), p. 323[15]
  • "The prince of Houston's gambling is Little Jakie Freedman, ..." - Fuermann, George (1951), p. 166.
  • "Jakie Freedman ... owned a large piece of The Sands in Las Vegas." - Miami News (1958)[16]
  • "Gala Sands Opening Tonight Greeting the thousands of well-wishers, principal owner Jake Freedman ..." - Las Vegas Sun (1952)[17]
Anyway, I can go on. I think you should focus on the ALT version, BTW. I took out the "moved to Las Vegas" since that could be interpreted as actually setting up residence in Vegas which was not true of the Maceos. As far as "some of Texas' most notorious" unfortunately there is no simple list of Texas top crime figures of that era that I know of. But I believe their notoriety and significance in Texas' vice is more than established.
Please let me know what more you need.
Thanks.
--Mcorazao (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Interesting reading! I haven't had the time to do a thorough review yet. However, while you've convinced me that there were vice crackdowns in Texas, and some of the most notorious gambling and prostitution operators moved their operations from Texas to Las Vegas, that's not enough to support the DYK hook. The hook needs to be supported by the content of the article, and the article content needs to be supported by the sources cited in the article. Are the sources that you cite above also used in the article? --Orlady (talk) 19:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes, though not all in one place. --Mcorazao (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Though certainly anything that will get this through DYK is ok, my personal opinion is that a statement like this doesn't say much. Cities all over the U.S. (and the world) have had vice districts like these so that is nothing particularly unique. The fact that Texas organized crime figures had important roles in founding major venues on the Vegas strip, to me, is more interesting and more unique. But again, if this is what it takes to get through DYK I'm ok with it. --Mcorazao (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I am confident that this article can go to DYK with a really interesting hook. (There's been a lot of interesting vice in Texas!) It's just that reviewing it requires a lot of uninterrupted attention. --Orlady (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on February 28

Tiger Raj Singh

I'm always still against "Here is a fact about somebody/aProduct in the news lately we want to promote" - this being a prime example. It would need a hook, not just a fact, to make it interesting enough for people to click through and read. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 00:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg In addition to the point made by Sherurcij, the article is only 1141 characters and is marked as stub-class. Also, I'm dubious that he meets WP:N. cmadler (talk) 21:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
  • If you resolve the Nobility issue the article is now 1500+ characters -- Esemono (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Symbol possible vote.svg The AFD seems to be leaning to "keep", but I copyedited the article and it is now under 1500 b. Ucucha 13:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Article has now been expanded to above 1500+ characters even discounting the quote. -- Esemono (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go when the AfD's handled. It'd have to be closed early, as in today though. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Is it possible to get it rushed? -- Esemono (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Special occasion holding area

Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated within five days of creation or expansion as usual (with the exception of April Fools' - see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know). Also, articles should be nominated at least five days before the occasion to give reviewers time to check the nomination.

Articles created/expanded for March 21

Gí¤chinger Kantorei

suggesting to post it on the composer's 325th birthday, still celebrated ("Old Style Date") 21 March. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg/Symbol possible vote.svg The first is for Gí¤chinger Kantorei which appears to check out on references, dates, and length but has a few paragraphs with no references at all. The second is for Bach-Collegium Stuttgart, a stub of just 1099 characters of prose. - Dravecky (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I added a few references to Gí¤chinger Kantorei. Please be specific as to what else should be referenced. Requiem of Reconciliation or Die beiden Neffen - I thought the respective articles are reference enough. I could list many more festivals according to the Oregon reference. I might also refer to reviews such as [18], quote: "Helmut Rilling's Bach still has not received the acclaim it surely deserves, particularly from the critical community in English-speaking countries. The reasons are not hard to fathom: he hasn't toured or conducted frequently outside of Germany (aside from the Oregon Bach Festival, one of America's best kept musical secrets), and his work competes directly with the many authentic instrument groups in the U.K. and France, and so faces an uphill battle against some pretty entrenched musical interests. But there's no question in my mind that he is one of our great Bach conductors, and this new recording of the B minor Mass bears this out." As to Bach-Collegium: I would have preferred to treat the two ensembles in one article, as Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra & Choir, but the (many) red links had them separate. Should I really repeat more of the choir information in the orchestra article. (I don't like redundancy.) Thanks for your interest! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Gerda, I'm glad to see you still here and improving our English-language coverage of German music(ians)! If you think the Bach-Collegium Stuttgart would be best addressed within the Gí¤chinger Kantorei article (which makes sense, given the close relationship), merge it in as a section of its own, and then make Bach-Collegium Stuttgart a redirect to that section. That way the links will point to the correct portion of the article. If you want to go this route and need help, drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks for this sensible suggestion. I looked at it but found it tricky to include the orchestra as a separate entity into the Kantorei (btw: any good English term for that kind of a choir?) because even after the orchestra was founded the Kantorei did many programs with other orchestras. Therefore I suggest
  • Sorry, I don't know a simple English term for that. The best I could do would be to call it a "professional mixed choir primarily performing sacred music" -- a description, not a term. cmadler (talk) 16:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Hoping not to disappoint you: it does not mean professional. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Semi-professional? (Meaning, either paid, but at a low level, probably not the participants' primary job, or sometimes meaning unpaid but consisting of members who are mostly professionals in that field, such as an orchestra made up of university instructors.) cmadler (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes, sort of. See (new) ref 5, all quote: "They're very musical. ... They have a distinct sound - that is, less vibrato than you have in other choirs. Their dexterity, their musicianship, their sensitivity is first-rate. Having worked with Rilling over many, many years, they have an expressiveness and an understanding of interpretation, particularity of Bach repertory, that really is wonderful." - Saltzman's not the only one singing the choir's praises. It's abilities are readily apparent to anyone - especially to critics - who has listened to Rilling's recordings. Together with their orchestral partner, the Bach Collegium, they have recorded all of Bach's cantatas and passions - some 200 in all - on CD. ... They have also sung many world and European first performances including "Litany" by Arvo Part, and "Requiem Versohnung" and "Deus Passus" by Wolfgang Rihm. ... Yet, for all its visibility - the choir sings 60 to 70 concerts a year - Rilling points out it "is not a professional chorus in the way that they would make their living from that. They are getting paid expenses and hotels and so on, but they are not really paid people. It is a challenge for them to be in that chorus." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Symbol confirmed.svg ALT2, suggest holding this for March 21 anniversary. Struck through other hook proposals so they aren't accidentally selected. Added "first complete" to ALT2, as that's the really remarkable part. cmadler (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Moved to holding area for 3/21. cmadler (talk) 14:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Gloria in excelsis Deo, BWV 191

  • Umm, that is extremely common and extends back to the earliest period of Christianity. --Eusebeus (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
  • The fact about the early Christians having used that symbol is true, but to mention it also in the hook would make it too long, right? Also it is not part of this article, the first one about a Bach cantata with the new format for the article name, adding the number to the German (or, as in this one and only case, Latin) title. - I doubt, by the way, that the hook fact is so commonly known. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
But You'd have to cit this fact in the main article. -- Esemono (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
  • We could use this [19] stating that there is A Latin cantata "... no surprise that there is a generous collection of Latin church music in the Bach treasury, including two versions of the Magnificat, four Lutheran Masses (five if you include the Missa* BWV 232), a Latin texted Cantata (BWV 191) and for many the ultimate Bach work, his Mass in B minor ..." - but I personally don't like the wording that Bach "shamelessly" reworked, in there. Or this [20] (click on "full text") - but that's liner notes which my esteemed co-writer doesn't approve ... - Or you just look at the complete list and see the one Latin among all the Germans and two Italian ones (203 & 209). Proposing therefore (also because "cantata" is a rather poor article I would not like to link to, - a more specific "Bach cantata" in preparation):
  • ALT2 ... that Gloria in excelsis Deo, BWV 191, a sacred cantata of Johann Sebastian Bach, is the only one of his cantatas set to a Latin text? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
I also found one more, and this review states it also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Thinking further: "sacred", "Latin" - quite heavy stuff for main page, and redundant, - assuming that many people might know that "Gloria in excelsis Deo" is both. Also it's not so interesting that Bach wrote only this one cantata in Latin (reworking what he had written in Latin before), but surprising that he wrote one in Latin at all. So I suggest to return to the original hook or perhaps
  • Length and article creation are fine, and ALT4 is a good hook, except that I can't find that fact cited (or even explicitly stated) in the article. Please add it in, with a citation, and this will be ready to go. cmadler (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I added a sentence and a citation for the "only Latin" (mentioned here before, the liner notes). "200 sacred cantatas" is such a trivia knowledge (s. [21] or compare Johann Sebastian Bach#Works, Vocal and choral works) that I hopefully don't have to cite that also, right? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Approve, and move to holding area for 3/21 (JS Bach's 325th birthday). cmadler (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Struck out earlier proposed hooks, ALT4 should be used. cmadler (talk) 16:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


Articles created/expanded for April Fools' Day (April 1)

Please add your nomination by clicking on the following link Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know

See also


Template talk:Did you know


  WikiTude Home

  Celebrity Directory
  Celebrity Pictures
  Celebrity Desktop
  Celebrity Screensavers
  Celebrity Wallpapers
  Celebrity Music Videos
  Song Lyrics
  Celebrity News
  Celebrity Bios
  Celebrity Posters
  Celebrity Movies
  Celebrity Music
  Celebrity Books
  Celebrity Videos
  Latest Celebrity Photos
  Celebrity Candids
  Celebrity Unofficial
  Celebrity Pics
  Celebrity Feet Pics
  Celebrity Video Clips
  Celebrity Articles
  Celebrity Blogs
  Celebrity eBay
  Celebrity Gossip
  Celebrity Photos
  Celebrity YouTube
  Video Celebrity News

  Contact Celebrities
  Celebrity Games
  Celebrity Popularity
  Celebrity
  Celebrity Websites

  Music
  Movies
  Web Portal
  POPped NEWS
  Books
  Games
  Flash Games
  Mortgages
  News Blog
  Quotes
  Travel
  TV Listings
  Tools & Gadgets
  Web Owner Tools















Privacy Policy